Liddles Attorneys Inc
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • What We Do
  • Contact Us
  • Media, Social Media & Other Links
  • Blog

Access To Justice Denied

29/6/2021

2 Comments

 
Our Constitutional Right of Access to Justice was dealt a major blow by the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) judgment handed down on 25 June 2021, which overturned the Gauteng Court judgment in Thobejane and the Eastern Cape judgment in Gqirana.
 
The Thobejane and Gqirana judgments were progressive in the expansion of Consumer Rights by holding that the Banks must proceed with legal action against Consumers in the Magistrates’ Court closest to the Consumer, where the monies owed falls within jurisdiction of such Magistrates and/or Regional Court.
 
These two judgments ensured that Consumers were not forced to pay their attorneys and advocates the extensive legal costs that are incurred in order to defend legal actions instituted in the High Courts. Instead, Consumers must be able to defend the Bank’s actions in their nearby, local Magistrates’ Court at significantly less legal expense.
 
In fact, aforementioned judgments gave consideration to the right of access to justice, particularly for Consumers that are already struggling financially, and held that it was an abuse of process for Banks to institute proceedings in the High Court when they could have proceeded in the Magistrates’ Court.
 
Much to the delight of Banks, the SCA has gone in the opposite direction and held that a High Court is obliged by law to hear any matter that falls within its jurisdiction and has no power to exercise a discretion to decline to hear a matter on the grounds that another, less expensive court has concurrent jurisdiction.
 
The tragedy is that unless this SCA decision is taken on appeal to the Constitutional Court by the self-same struggling Consumers that are unable to pay hundreds of thousands of Rand in legal costs, the door to access justice has been shut firmly in our faces.
 
Nonetheless, our highly experienced legal team at Liddle and Associates Inc will continue to champion Consumer’s rights with both our directors regularly appearing in the Western Cape High Court to protect and safeguard our Clients’ homes and vehicles from being repossessed and sold in execution by the Banks.
2 Comments
Zak King link
2/7/2021 10:59:40 am

Could other interested parties perhaps bring the funds to the table to escalate the matter to Con Court?

Reply
Robyn link
2/7/2021 01:36:46 pm

It is possible that interested parties appointed as amicus could ask for leave to approach the Constitutional Court direct for a declaratory order relating to the matter. We could attempt crowd funding, remember this will be expensive as we would need to cite NCR, Banks, Credit Providers etc, and all these people will appoint Juniors and Seniors and their own attorneys, and the Applicants run the risk of costs being awarded against them (although this is highly unlikely).

Alternatively, we can proceed with an existing matter and file a Special Plea of Jurisdiction (Liddles has actually already done this in one of our own matters) and take it on appeal once the Special Plea is dismissed (which would be much less risky). However, the consumers don’t want to carry the risk if anything bad happens, so we will need to fund them on this as well. But we would need to assess the merits of each case and ensure we have strong merits, so the matter doesn’t get kicked to touch for some other reason.

Each case rises and falls on its own merits in this situation.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Liddles Team

    Archives

    January 2022
    September 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021

    Categories

    All
    Bank
    Consumer
    Conveyancing
    Credit Rights
    Debt Review
    Default
    Payments
    Personal Information
    Policy
    POPI
    POPIA
    Repossession
    Transfer Duty

Site powered by Weebly. Managed by Bluehost
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • What We Do
  • Contact Us
  • Media, Social Media & Other Links
  • Blog